Europe which has lost the mind prepares for war with Russia?

Again, as well as more than 70 years ago when Hitler attacked the USSR, Ukraine is elected as a battlefield. The European politicians, probably, having lost the last remains of judiciousness, rashly, started actively supporting the Ukrainian oligarchs who seek «to push» the agreement on association with EU in every way. Russia keeps the Olympian calm, but how many it will show, nobody knows it.

My Czech colleague Václav Danda published the article under the loud-speaking name «Revolution in Ukraine — preparation for war with Russia?» the other day in the newspaper «PROTIPROUD». This fact says that despite the mad and aggressive information company in our mass media in favour of signing of the agreement on association with EU by Ukraine, still it is possible to find politicians in Europe and journalists who think differently.

Warsaw has to think about it. First of all I want to ask a simple question: whether Poland is ready to pay the price for such step of Ukraine which has no money in general? Now we have more than 2 million unemployed, and the economy endures if not the crisis, but deep stagnation.

And each country, the member of EU, should pay the share for the maintenance of 45 million poor Ukrainians. Supporters of European integration of Ukraine in Poland whom treats both the president, and the prime minister, try to prove in vain that the entry of Ukraine into EU will allow to load the Polish economy. It sounds simply ridiculously as it is absolutely impossible to believe that the poor Ukrainians receiving the pension less than 80 Euro and a salary in 200−300 Euro, somewhere specially hid the money that then, after agreement signing with EU, to pull out them and to go to shops buying up the Polish goods.

Thus, it is obvious that the reason of unprecedented pressure upon Ukraine from the European Union and the USA is not the economy, but the policy.

Václav Danda fairly notes: «…That occurs now in Ukraine, the president Vladimir Putin called as „disorder“ and urged the Ukrainians to keep the calm. Of course, it is the last what was required to directors of this dangerous theatre. Their purpose, on the contrary, consisted in causing the civil war and that the minority which has lost elections came to the power. It is also necessary to provoke armed conflicts between so-called „demonstrators“ and divisions of power structures. Such scenario of intelligence service was used in Syria. We look for consequences every day."

I want to express sincere gratitude to my Czech colleague for these truthful words:

- Someone, probably, will decide that the Czech European sceptics have to be for revolutionaries and wish them good luck in their attempts to hold on Ukraine to EU as it can mean the weakening of the centralized tendencies, „dilution“ of the power of Brussels and gradual disintegration of E. U. However not everything is so simple. Attempt to include Ukraine in EU, probably, its division, is, first of all, a strategic attack across Russia. Russia is „last bastion“ in fight against strengthening of power of the New world order. Therefore it is necessary to estimate events in Ukraine in wider context.

What became the main reason of that the known and skilled Soros agencies specializing on the organization of revolutions, started the operation „Ukraine“?
The president Victor Yanukovych refused to sign the contract on association with the European Union which would disorganize Ukraine economically and politically. Companions in Brussels turned white for rage. From the point of view of Barroso and his „brothers under cover“, the situation is clear: or Ukraine will be ours, or will fall; we won’t allow it to keep present level of cooperation with Russia.

And the main reason of it is that operation of „civil war“ in Ukraine is developed as reality show. The matter is, neither more nor less, about psychological and strategic training of citizens of EU for the war against Russia. At least to „cold“ war.

Instability on the Russian borders and inflow of the armed „militarized“ groups going to Ukraine from all Europe, have some purposes. Including to transfer „revolutionary chaos“ through the borders to Russia. However the attempt to divide Ukraine and to build new „pro-European state“ on the Russian borders is more important.

On the Kiev streets, Václav Danda writes, „hired tourists“ from all Europe battle who together with a criminal underground are the centre of so-called „pro-European meetings“. Such internationalization of demonstrations the agencies tried in Syria where the foreign mercenaries who have replaced first protesting on streets of Damascus battle today.

It isn’t casual that all our (the Czech — author’s comment) main Babis-Bakalovsk newspapers squeal from delight because of „revolution in Kiev“. The articles of Luboš Palata are especially remarkable who just in case for „line preservation“ supplies at once two newspapers of Babis pack with the articles — MF DNES and Lidové noviny. The innovation of the new Babis management of both editions is noteworthy. But, of course, Bakalovsk Czech television and Radiožurnál do „news“ in the same spirit in primitive live broadcasts without Babiš.

In Ukraine we will see the consequences of exclusively dangerous crisis in the next few days. But, of course, it is impossible to think that professional revolutionaries from the European Union will refuse „rights“ for one more colony of Brussels, and that in Ukraine the peace will set in again. Apparently, all this is only overture and showdown.

However the transfer of „big chaos“ closer to our borders shouldn’t leave us indifferent this time. Thus the war, while symbolically, is transferred to Europe. We are waited by restless times.» (Quote end).

It would be desirable to add my dear colleague a little. I think that we, Europeans, have the short memory. When Hitler attacked Poland on September 1, 1939, other Europe in the person of England and France betrayed us. And many European countries, such as Romania, Hungary, Croatia and others, voluntary rushed together with Hitler to Russia and participated there in his atrocities. And the Polish Army covered the banners with fadeless glory, battling against the fascism. Poland, unlike almost all European countries, didn’t obey Hitler. There were no Polish parts also as a part of SS armies, but there were the Ukrainian, Croatian, Norwegian, Belgian, French. Poles didn’t dishonour themselves by such phenomenon. Certainly, many Poles remember Warsaw revolt of 1861 and earlier suppression of the Polish revolts by Alexander Suvorov. Russians like to speak about exile of armies of Sigismund from the Kremlin in 1612 and the national hero Ivan Susanin. But why to fixate the attention on these facts of common knowledge of an old story when many people live in Poland who well remember how the Red Army exempted us from fascism? And whether the Poles are worthy to participate in the anti-Russian actions like the Ukrainian revolution?

Now the maniacal idea about creation of «Wielka Polska» wanders in the heads of the Polish politicians in which the territories of Ukraine act as east lands. The Baltic States also actively participating in the organization and support of the Ukrainian revolution, also hope to receive the share of pie from this process.

Against all these phenomena the Russian factor somehow isn’t considered. And deliberate restraint of Moscow probably is regarded by some near statesmen as a sign of almost weaknesses. But it would be a big mistake to think that it is valid so.

Also there is nothing more inexcusable for the politician, than his own nonsense.

The president of the Washington Centre for National Interests, the publisher of the The National Interest magazine Dmitri Simes speaks very well about it.

- Experience of the last 20 years shows that support words from politicians from the USA and EU hardly will turn into specific actions — at least that level which would be required to economy of Ukraine in lack of the Russian subsidies. Moreover, the Ukrainian opposition should listen very attentively to what is told by officials from the USA and E. U. In a case with the United States the signal is clear: Washington is disappointed by the president Victor Yanukovych, but doesn’t support his violent overthrow. The Deputy U. S. Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, according to mass media, introduced this idea at a meeting with leaders of opposition. Any to whom the track record of madam Nuland including service on posts of the constant representative of the USA at NATO is familiar, the adviser to the vice-president Dick Cheney for national security, the speaker Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and, by the way, the spouse of the publicist — the neoconservative Robert Kagan, know that this caution is dictated at all by a lack of sympathy to Ukrainian protesting.

The American policy concerning Ukraine, supported by both political parties, has a kind feeling its gradual integration into the European Union and eventually in NATO.

But the United States never were going to provide it the multi-billion financial help, preferring to rely on loans of the IMF which usually are given on very strict conditions instead. It is that territory in which Washington could help to organize more favourable conditions for Kiev if that wants to move towards conclusion of agreement with the European Union. Thus neither Obama’s administration, nor the American people have desire to enter confrontation with Russia because of Ukraine. Today Obama’s administration is interested in cooperation with the Russian Federation on urgent international issues as: Iran and Syria. Accruing intensity between the USA and Beijing also doesn’t promote desire to clash also with Moscow.

The European Union is sincerely more interested to take Ukraine under its wing. Some E. U. Member States, namely Lithuania and Poland, consider that safety reasons demand to take away Ukraine from Russia. Such policy is also a part of centuries-old rivalry with Russia for domination in Eastern and the Central Europe. For many others in the European Union safety reasons, probably, are less important, but encouragement of movement of Ukraine towards the West is represented symbolical manifestation of virtue inherent in the European project and wisdom, in times when European sceptics get the increasing support on elections.

If not to take the successful territorial expansion into account, in the majority of questions the European Union has nothing to brag. The economic situation in EU is very difficult, in particular in the Mediterranean countries. EU couldn’t cope effectively with problems of mass migration and didn’t find a way to absorb big streams of the newly arrived. Besides hardly it is possible to call success the European interventions in time of «Arab spring». The enthusiasm of London and Paris concerning invasion into Syria besieged turn at first the British parliament, and then and Obama’s administrations, to a consent with Russia, convinced to pass to destruction of the Syrian arsenal of the chemical weapon.

In such situation the occurrence of the Post-Soviet countries and first of all Ukraine in an orbit of the European Union, could grant the right to the European politicians to claim that all of them still are «on the correct party of history».

Despite it, both the European Union and mister Yanukovych understood on own difficult experience that EU isn’t ready to support the rhetoric money. In lack of strong support from the USA the European Union with its weak military resources isn’t ready to assume responsibility and for ensuring stability in Ukraine, especially in case of new «orange revolution».

In view of that fact that to oust the weakening Ukrainian president can be simpler, than replace him with the effective and legitimate successor, the leaders of the Ukrainian opposition have to think twice before trying to overthrow the results of free and fair elections or even more to destabilize the country, which as it appeared, not easy to operate even under the most favourable circumstances.

You shouldn’t be deceived, today there are no impudent vizionary among the European leaders like Churchill or De Gaulle. There are even no politicians among them of Thatcher or Kohl level.

The present European presidents and prime ministers are at best the pragmatic, ordinary politicians who are going down stream. For them it is absolutely natural to demand from Russia non-interference to the Ukrainian affairs and at the same time very much to push Ukraine to signing of the contract with the European Union. Who will pay for approach of Ukraine to Europe and in particular who will ensure safety of the country — it is absolutely other questions. Experience shows that the smiles of leaders of Poland and Lithuania during official photo session with Saakashvili in August, 2008, means a little and symbolical embraces are not the real support. Leaders of the Ukrainian opposition should have reflected on it. (Quote end).

Poland already made a big mistake, having agreed to placement of the American antimissiles in the territory. In reply we received the Russian Iskander complexes in Kaliningrad that made the people of Poland the hostage of the decisions made not in Warsaw, but in Washington and Moscow even more.

Further escalation of the Ukrainian conflict threatens to turn all Eastern Europe into a chaos and fear kingdom when tens of millions Ukrainians will rush there in search of the best destiny.

It is obvious that for the European Union isn’t the purpose to provide their worthy existence in conditions when from 25 to 40 percent of the population in the European Union countries live below the poverty line and unemployment rate reached critical size.

The financial means of the European Union are spent for kindling of the Ukrainian conflict, an outfoxing and making fool of the Ukrainian society. And none of politicians answer a question: is it better to spend this money for solutions of own economic problems of our countries. And why the Europeans have to pay imaginations of the officials and an ambition of the Ukrainian oligarchs?

By the way, being recently in Kiev, I heard such joke:

- The western journalist asks the lousy, filthy and dirty member of Maidan who absorbs a huge piece of bread with sausage with visible pleasure:

- Are you for association with EU?
- No.
- Are you for entry of Ukraine into the Customs Union?
- No.
- And why do you stand here?
- And where I will find such freebie and every day?, follows quite logical answer for Ukrainians of this kind.

Our politicians, dealing with Ukraine, long ago have to understand that every day of Euromaidan for the European money exsanguinate our economy. And the Ukrainian crisis is quite capable to go out of Ukraine.

They shouldn’t think that Russia will give Ukraine to a sphere of influence of the European Union. It is top or naivete or nonsense.