“Hangout with a fascist shade” – to whom the useless Euromaidan is favourable?

The Euromaidan is revolution false start in Ukraine which was useless both for the Ukrainian opposition and for the western countries supporting it —the editor-in-chief of the newspaper «Kiev Telegraph» Vladimir Sergeyevich Skachko answers the questions of «The world and we».

— What are the main forces in and outside Ukraine led to Euromaidan emergence, on what this protest action is actually directed?

Euromaidan is such unsuccessful combination of internal and external factors for the power which was imposed on fatigue from this power. The present leadership of Ukraine, trying to receive though any money from Europe, very long deceived own people by a campaign in the European Union, distracted it from internal problems by external promises. And when the power understood that it won’t pay, sharply pressed «emergency brake» in this «fantastic» movement. And then all internal problems escaped — people began to live even worse and they were taken the dream away.

Euromaidan is typical revolution in the regime of Rogulsky hangout with a fascist shade. Besides, it is the typical false start. Euromaidan with all its receptions, techniques, ideological coloring, elements of imaginary political apathy is everything that had to play in 2015. But it is false start because under all requirements of change of the power, the participants of Euromaidan have even no elementary occasion. In 2015 there would be an already repeatedly approved occasion of falsification of vote, charge of usurpation of the power and theft of will of the people. But now it is absent even. Therefore we see revolution false start against lawful, absolutely legitimate and recognized that by power in Ukraine. Presidential election of 2010, despite that proteges of «democratic world» lost them, was recognized honest and taken place. They are opposed only by Yulia Timoshenko but who will believe the woman who «lying sits»?

— Who supports the continuation of this «false start» in the center of Kiev? To whom is it favourable that the Euromaidan continued its existence?

It is a good mine at bad game. If the Maidan leaves, in general having achieved nothing, it will be loss of everything who tried to play on it. First of all it is the loss for an oppositional trinity «Coward, Goof and Skilled» — Yatsenyuk, Tyaghnybok and Klitschko who tried «to stick» to this issue. If they lose Euromaidan and it would turn out nothing except the dirtied city, it only will add the image of three brought-down pilots to them.

On the other hand, Maidan is continued by people who anyway try to receive something from the power. For example, there are claims to the Minister of Internal Affairs — inflate domestic squabbles with Tatyana Chernovol’s beating to an arbitrariness of militia ranks. Or, for example, the militia starts finding out who drives up to a private property, to houses of the prime minister, the public prosecutor, the president, breaks into a private property, and the Maidan right there answers with campaigns and pressure upon State Motor Vehicle Inspectorate with the requirement to stop «arbitrariness». Any personnel problems and requirements will be the following. But it is possible to predict that appeals not to punish those who turned the downtown, office buildings in trashcans begin the most important requirements of the Euromaidan, that, in what to degenerate all set of its requirements. All will end on that. If the frost comes in combination with amnesty from the authorities, the Maidan will disperse from the first real cold weather.

—Is it right that the Euromaidan became the way, the tool of pressure of part of the Ukrainian oligarchs on the power for the purpose of its change because of not signing of the Agreement on association with EU?

Euromaidan was really used by oligarchs for pressure upon the power. But the power suppressed revolt of oligarchs very easily, having beaten out at Russia the discounts for gas and the promise to deal with these oligarchs. How the pro-European oligarchs were adjusted, whatever suits from Versace they put on — boxer shorts all the same appear through. It means that all know an origin of the capital of the Ukrainian oligarchs — this theft of the Russian energy carriers and speculative sale of everything that can make profit. And even those dividends which they receive, selling metal, pipes, petro-chemistry products — all the same at the heart of all this is the Russian gas and the capitals which are stolen and saved up on this gas. And therefore one threat to block the crane or to make property of the public the nature of an origin of these capitals very easily calmed «oligarchic revolt». There were only private moments which will be solved by oligarchs, feeding up this Maidan.

If the power was slightly more resolute if instead of Yanukovych who tries to represent any «cream dumpling» on tank armour and to imitate certain tender mummy of all Ukrainian people if instead of him there was normal, pragmatic, all understanding Nikolay Yanovich Azarov — the Maidan already would remain only in national memory and on pages of «Ukrainian truth».

Therefore Maidan is generation of indecision of the power which shows surprising patience — it hopes that it will resolve for it absolutely without serious consequences. So it will occur. But, nevertheless, moral losses of the power from the Euromaidan which couldn’t show that it is the power that is capable to struggle with extremists, fascists, destroyers of monuments, will be huge. The power, which cease to be afraid, loses the sacrality — they laugh and frankly scoff at it. Even if it will win and Maidan will disperse, it will be as speak in a joke — the spoons were found, but the after-taste remained. This after-taste remains and is unclear how this power will be able to get rid of this after-taste till 2015.

— What role in emergence and maintenance of activity of Euromaidan was played by the western states? Is Euromaidan the project which is initiated from their party?

For them it was a bolt from the blue and it appeared false start too. They were put and prepared for holding such actions in 2015, according to their instructions, indirectly through their funds the fighters and so-called civil activists who have to represent «indignant citizens» were prepared. And when there was a false start, the western countries were compelled to react somehow. And they reacted stupidly, silly and extremely frankly. Victoria Nuland, the Deputy U. S. Secretary of State who feeds with dry biscuits of the free lances, silly people whom they brought to the Maidan —is it a shame?! It is clear that campaigns of the speaker of the Lithuanian parliament Lauretta Grauzhinene, the Supreme representative of the European Union on foreign affairs and a security policy of Catherine Ashton and other European politicians humiliated Ukraine as the independent state.

But they humiliated not only Ukraine — they humiliated and showed in the extremely unattractive light Europe and that Europe doesn’t hide the colonial relation to Ukraine any more. There is no «second bottom» and everything is extremely frank — we told you and you have to make. Not «Bandera will come and make the order», but Catherine Ashton will arrive and will explain what and where «to stick». Therefore Euromaidan is the false start for the West too. They had to join it but as they have no brains, nor tactical receptions and backup plan, everything turned out frankly and extremely silly. If the collective reason of the Ukrainian people could analyse it — it would understand and was terrified. But alas — we have what we have.

— How do you estimate the diplomatic efforts of Russia in this situation — whether they played a crucial role in relative stabilization of an internal political situation in Ukraine?

There were no special diplomatic efforts of Russia. From the diplomatic point of view Russia silently looked at the events, except for participation of Russia in discussion of the Ukrainian questions when the Russian diplomats in the person of Lavrov spoke — let’s not to interfere, let they will understand. Russia interfered absolutely in a different way as in the well-known joke about guerrillas and Germans who took a clearing by turns — eventually, they woke the forester who came and dispersed both that and others. When Russia bothered to look how Ukraine goes to Europe and as Europe doesn’t understand what to do with this Ukraine, Russia came and told that nobody goes somewhere. If you need money, so receive.

It is clear that behind the money of Russia there are its geopolitical plans — as Putin and his team said that they help fraternal people, all the same there are geopolitical moments behind it. But among other things there is also about what they speak — the help of the fraternal Russian people to fraternal people of Ukraine. Because if there was no this money, already now the country would be in a default. And now we have a chance not only to eat this money, but also to start up any part on restarting the Ukrainian economy on the new, really market principles relieved of corruption, an administrative resource, and oligarchic influence which has no relation to market mechanisms, production and social processes.

— Can the acts of terrorism in Volgograd be the reciprocal actions on foreign policy progress of Russia, revenge from forces which supported the war in Syria and intensity growth in Ukraine?

One of motivations of terrorists whom started to blow up Volgograd in that though somehow to revenge Russia that though somehow to level its surprising, phenomenal foreign policy progress. Such wasn’t long ago that Russia put the USA, and then EU into place twice. I put purely diplomatic and economic methods. It is meant the victory in Syria when Russia helped Americans not to walk smack in new adventure. And certainly, a victory on the Ukrainian direction. I even suspected that Syria was given to Russia to calm it and to take away Ukraine from it under the nose. But Putin was wiser — even if there were such plans, the President of Russia destroyed them.

Certainly, for such two geopolitical success Russia had to give a flick. It was also made. As, probably, the Caucasian copper is locked very strongly, the first city with over a million dwellers to which terrorists could leave, unfortunately appeared Volgograd. Therefore it was blown up also already by three times. And not because Volgograd has any a geostrategic importance —most likely, they couldn’t take such amount of explosive somewhere geographically further from the Caucasus. Therefore blew up in a city with over a million dwellers. Also it is possible to sympathize and be terrified only to that was made.