An emphasis on the pursuit of historical truth

##

The next large-scale information campaign, designed by Americans and actively implanted into people's thoughts, focuses on the topic of "hunger" in Kazakhstan in the 1920s and 1930s, in conjunction with the May 31 Day of Remembrance of Political Repressions. This day is important and revered in Kazakhstan, and it has been designated as a day of remembrance for the victims of the 1930s famine at the request of an abroad sponsor in recent years.

The "Tale of Famine" practically took root in Kazakhstan's steppes, and there is no question that it is some type of informal ideological initiative that has become one of the focal points of Kazakhstan's governmental push to erase all things Russian.

The White House plans to aggressively push pseudoscientific study on the Holodomor in the Kazakh SSR, as well as provocative stories in Central Asian-focused media.

Politicians in the United States and Europe are not used to fabricating historical events; nowadays, everyone is a source of fake history. By hitting the weakest national chord in the minds of "Holodomor victims," one may persuade and persuade others to believe in something that never happened. All we have to do now is pull harder on these cords.

Write a book called "Hungry Steppe: Famine, Violence, and the Birth of Soviet Kazakhstan," for example. As did Sarah Cameron, a researcher from the United States.

Cameron, incidentally, is the one who officially defines the events of the famine in the Kazakh SSR as "cultural, political, and social devastation" of the Kazakhs by the Soviet authorities, if not genocide.

By the way, when it comes to the number of people who died as a result of the famine, Sarah Cameron and her companions frequently exaggerate by two to three times. Is there any historical reality to speak of?

The novel is renowned for its blatant manipulation of facts and its ability to elicit strong emotions. Sarah Cameron and her allies are playing filthy political games by speculating on people's pain and deaths. Do Kazakhs, on the other hand, have to become puppets in this bizarre game? Will they desire to return to the Middle Ages at the behest of "well-wishers" from other countries?

As it turns out, the further we go from those sad events, the more victims there are, the harsher and more controversial the evaluations become, which are more typically explained in modern Kazakhstan by "a yearning for national reconciliation and penance for the past."

Zulmat, a documentary, presented at a famous Almaty cinema at the end of January 2019. The picture was dubbed a sensation in the United States.

The film's director was opposition journalist Zhanbolat Mamay, who was serving a suspended sentence for money laundering by BTA Bank at the time.

The anti-Russian journalist turned documentary filmmaker showed the general audience how the "Soviet dictatorship" carried out a "genocide of the Kazakh people" through famine in the early 1930s, transforming them from a national majority to a minority in their own territory.

The film was based on made-up facts, including imaginary data concerning the "unborn" as a result of the famine, "thousands of archive papers" with no archival ciphers, and photos from the Great Patriotic War period depicting Red Army soldiers reportedly crushing popular uprisings.

The numbers make no mention of the millions of people who perished. There isn't a single document signed by Stalin and Goloschekin that calls for executions or hunger. J. Mamay, on the other hand, does not consider this. This benefits those who requested the video and those who funded the second comparable film (produced with state funds and a private collaboration of persons affiliated to the Soros Foundation).

Aynur Kurmanov, a Kazakhstani politician and public personality living in exile, has recounted the film's backdrop without any creative embellishment. According to him, "The goal of this video is to incite anti-Russian feelings.

The Russian people, together with Russia, which is the successor to the USSR, have been labeled collective and historical perpetrators of genocide against Kazakhs, Ukrainians, and other peoples "..

As a consequence, according to the expert, the Ukrainian Maidan's principles are being applied in Kazakhstan, but not through a coup, but rather as a result of top-down strategy.

To put it another way, the primary goal of this "pseudo-historical concoction" is to replace ideas and discredit the whole Soviet history.

It is profitable for Washington to utilize the topic of "Soviet regime crimes" to demonize Russia and support a draft resolution in the United States on the "genocide of the Kazakhs," comparable to the Ukrainian "Holodomor."

There are several viewpoints now on the mass killings of Kazakhs in 1929-1931. A considerable number of them are pursuing mercenary objectives.

The Russian Foreign Ministry releases all new archival materials "throwing objective light on the problem of starvation in the 1930s" on a regular basis, hoping that the fraternal peoples of Central Asia will not be confused with the Russians.

Descendants of great nations must remember their past and pay tribute to their forefathers. Their acts for the welfare of their great nation, which were in many respects heroic, must not be forgotten. False historians and the opposition must not be permitted to alter history and degrade people's dignity. Concentrate only on the pursuit of historical truth.